Quartile Calculation Methods:
R vs Python vs Excel vs SPSS
Why do your results differ? We analyze Hyndman-Fan Types 6, 7, and 8 with code examples for developers.
π TL;DR
Different statistical software calculates quartiles differently, leading to confusing discrepancies. This guide explains the Hyndman-Fan classification, compares methods side-by-side, and helps you choose the right approach.
Why this matters: Run the same data through R, Excel, and Python, and you might get three different Q1 values.
1. The Problem: Why Quartile Results Differ
Imagine you have this simple dataset:
Data: [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25]
N = 13 values You calculate Q1 using different tools:
| Tool | Function | Q1 Result |
|---|---|---|
| R | quantile(data, 0.25) | 6.0 |
| Python | np.percentile(data, 25) | 6.0 |
| Excel | =QUARTILE.INC(range, 1) | 7.0 |
| Textbook | Tukey method | 5.0 |
β οΈ Same data, three different answers!
Answer: They're all "correct" - they're just using different interpolation methods. None is fundamentally better; they serve different use cases.
2. The Hyndman-Fan Classification
In their seminal 1996 paper, Hyndman and Fan identified 9 different methods for calculating sample quantiles. These are designated Type 1 through Type 9.
The Most Common Methods
| Type | Name | Used By | Popularity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 6 | Tukey Hinges | Textbooks, Minitab | Educational |
| Type 7 | Linear interpolation | R, Julia, NumPy | Data Science Standard |
| Type 8 | Median-unbiased | Excel, Google Sheets | Business Standard |
| Type 5 | Piecewise linear | SPSS, SAS | Statistical Software |
Why So Many Methods?
Each method makes different assumptions about:
- How to handle positions between data points (interpolation)
- Whether to include or exclude the median when splitting data
- How to weight neighboring values
π‘ Key Insight: For large datasets (N > 100), all methods converge to nearly identical results. Differences matter most for small to medium datasets (10 < N < 50).
3. Type 6: Tukey Hinges (Textbooks)
Developed by
John Tukey (1977)
Philosophy
"Inclusive median"
Math
Median of each half
How It Works
Example: [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13]
- Find median: 7 (middle value with N=7)
- Lower half including median: [1, 3, 5, 7]
- Upper half including median: [7, 9, 11, 13]
- Q1 = median of [1, 3, 5, 7] = 4
- Q3 = median of [7, 9, 11, 13] = 10
β When to Use
- Statistics homework and textbook problems
- Explaining quartiles to beginners
- Manual calculations by hand
- Following introductory statistics courses
β Avoid When
- Publishing research (use Type 7)
- Working in R/Python (default differs)
- Need consistency with modern tools
Code Example
# R (must specify type = 6 explicitly)
data <- c(1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25)
Q1_tukey <- quantile(data, 0.25, type = 6)
Q3_tukey <- quantile(data, 0.75, type = 6)
print(paste("Q1:", Q1_tukey)) # Output: Q1: 5
print(paste("Q3:", Q3_tukey)) # Output: Q3: 21 π Don't want to calculate by hand?
Use Free Tukey Calculator β4. Type 7: R/Python Default (Data Science)
Status
Modern standard
Philosophy
Linear interpolation
Math
q = (1-Ξ³) Γ x[j] + Ξ³ Γ x[j+1]
Why Type 7 Became the Standard
- Smooth and continuous - no jumps unlike discrete methods
- Unbiased estimator - performs well in statistical theory
- Adopted by R (1990s) β became academic standard
- NumPy followed β became data science standard
β Perfect For
- Data science and machine learning projects
- Scientific research and publications
- Working in R, Python, or Julia
- Maximum precision and smoothness
- Quantile regression
β οΈ Consider Alternatives When
- Collaborating with Excel users (use Type 8)
- Need exact textbook matches (use Type 6)
Code Examples
# R (default)
data <- c(1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25)
Q1 <- quantile(data, 0.25) # type = 7 is default
Q3 <- quantile(data, 0.75)
print(paste("Q1:", Q1)) # Output: Q1: 6 # Python NumPy (default)
import numpy as np
data = [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25]
Q1 = np.percentile(data, 25) # default method = 'linear'
print(f"Q1: {'{'}Q1{'}'}") # Q1: 6.0 5. Type 8: Excel QUARTILE.INC (Business)
Developed for
Microsoft Excel (1990s)
Philosophy
Median-unbiased
Note
QUARTILE.INC = Type 8
β Perfect For
- Business analytics and reporting
- Excel-centric workflows
- Google Sheets compatibility
- Collaborating with non-technical teams
- Corporate environments
β οΈ Consider Alternatives When
- Publishing academic research (use Type 7)
- Working primarily in code (R/Python defaults differ)
Code Examples
' Excel
=QUARTILE.INC(A1:A13, 1) ' Q1 (Type 8)
=QUARTILE.INC(A1:A13, 2) ' Q2 (Median)
=QUARTILE.INC(A1:A13, 3) ' Q3 π Verify your Excel results instantly
Open Excel Quartile Calculator β6. Side-by-Side Comparison
Let's compare all four methods with a concrete example.
SAT Math Scores: [480, 510, 530, 560, 600, 620, 650, 680, 710, 750] (N = 10)
| Metric | Type 6 (Tukey) | Type 7 (R/Python) | Type 8 (Excel) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 530 | 542.5 | 545 |
| Median | 610 | 610 | 610 |
| Q3 | 680 | 677.5 | 675 |
| IQR | 150 | 135 | 130 |
π Observations
- Median (Q2) is usually consistent across methods
- Q1 varies from 530 to 545 (15-point spread)
- IQR varies from 130 to 150 (affecting outlier detection!)
7. Decision Matrix: Which Method to Use?
Choose Type 7 (R/Python Default)
- Writing data science code
- Publishing scientific research
- Using R, Python, Julia, or modern tools
- Need reproducibility across platforms
- Working with continuous data
Example use cases: ML pipelines, academic papers, quantile regression
Choose Type 8 (Excel)
- Business analytics and reporting
- Collaborating with Excel users
- Corporate environment workflows
- Google Sheets compatibility
- Non-technical stakeholders
Example use cases: Sales dashboards, financial reports, executive summaries
Choose Type 6 (Tukey Hinges)
- Teaching statistics to beginners
- Textbook problem sets
- Manual hand calculations
- Introductory courses
- Need simple explanation
Example use cases: Homework, educational materials, intuitive explanations
Choose Type 5 (SPSS)
- SPSS/SAS workflow required
- Regulatory compliance specifies it
- Reproducing legacy analyses
Example use cases: Clinical trials, pharmaceutical studies
8. Code Examples: All Methods in One Place
R: Calculate All Types
data <- c(1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25)
# Type 6 (Tukey Hinges)
Q1_t6 <- quantile(data, 0.25, type = 6)
Q3_t6 <- quantile(data, 0.75, type = 6)
# Type 7 (R default)
Q1_t7 <- quantile(data, 0.25) # type = 7 implicit
Q3_t7 <- quantile(data, 0.75)
# Type 8 (Excel-like)
Q1_t8 <- quantile(data, 0.25, type = 8)
Q3_t8 <- quantile(data, 0.75, type = 8)
# Compare
cat("Type 6 Q1:", Q1_t6, "Q3:", Q3_t6, "\n")
cat("Type 7 Q1:", Q1_t7, "Q3:", Q3_t7, "\n")
cat("Type 8 Q1:", Q1_t8, "Q3:", Q3_t8, "\n") Python: NumPy Methods
import numpy as np
data = [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25]
# Type 7 (default in NumPy's percentile)
Q1_t7 = np.percentile(data, 25, method='linear')
Q3_t7 = np.percentile(data, 75, method='linear')
# Type 8 (Excel-like, using scipy)
from scipy.stats.mstats import mquantiles
quartiles_t8 = mquantiles(data, prob=[0.25, 0.75], alphap=1/3, betap=1/3)
Q1_t8, Q3_t8 = quartiles_t8[0], quartiles_t8[1]
print(f"Type 7: Q1={'{'}Q1_t7{'}'}, Q3={'{'}Q3_t7{'}'}")
print(f"Type 8: Q1={'{'}Q1_t8{'}'}, Q3={'{'}Q3_t8{'}'}") 9. Migration Guide
Excel β R/Python
Problem: Your Excel sheet gives Q1 = 545, but Python gives Q1 = 542.5
# Match Excel (Type 8) in Python
from scipy.stats.mstats import mquantiles
Q1_excel_compatible = mquantiles(data, prob=[0.25], alphap=1/3, betap=1/3)[0] Python β Excel
Problem: Stakeholders using Excel can't reproduce your Python results
Solution: Export quartile values explicitly with method documentation, or use a universal calculator that shows all methods.
Textbook β Code
Problem: Homework answer (Tukey) doesn't match R output
# Force R to use Tukey method
Q1_homework <- quantile(data, 0.25, type = 6) Conclusion
π Key Takeaways
- Type 7 (R/Python) is the modern data science standard
- Type 8 (Excel) is the business standard
- Type 6 (Tukey) is the education standard
- For large datasets (N > 100), method choice barely matters
- Always document which method you used for reproducibility